Polyphonic Member Login

Lost your username or password?

Not a member yet?
Sign Up for Free!

Register How to Create a Profile

Dear Diary

0 Robert Levine

One of the unintended side-effects of helping to negotiate a new contract for one’s orchestra is the history that one learns along the way. This makes sense if one thinks about it; negotiations (especially regarding non-economic items) are often attempts by one or the other side to remedy problems that were often unforeseen when the relevant provisions of the contract were written, years or even decades ago.

I found myself, in the middle of a particularly trying caucus about some issue involving events that had happened years and years ago, attempting to write a history of the orchestra from the point of view of negotiations and contract administration. I quickly realized that 1) in the middle of a negotiation is not the time to start such a project, and 2) that I simply didn’t have a good enough memory to do it years after the fact.

So I’ve begun a contemporaneous record of the important events - from the standpoint of CBA negotiation and administration - that happen as the season goes by. These include:

  • auditions
  • any kinds of meetings and decisions regarding probation, tenure, and termination
  • any other kinds of disciplinary action
  • any contract waivers granted by the orchestra
  • any non-routine electronic media activity

Obviously this is not an exclusive list, and no doubt I’ll find some new kinds of things to record as they happen.

There are issues and problems with maintaining such a list. One major problem is that much of what happens in the personnel area is confidential. Presumably the union representative or orchestra committee chair will be in the loop, and can record such information. But what happens when new people come into those positions? Who will maintain and retain the history? What levels of confidentiality will be respected, and how will that be enforced internally?

It could be argued that all such significant events will leave a paper trail of some sort in the archives. Anyone making that argument should have a better archiving system than I’ve ever seen. Locals are not always good about maintaining records over long periods of time, and, even when they are, the relevant documents are liable to be scattered throughout the filing cabinets in individual members’ folders. And obviously having to ask management for records of long-ago events is not desirable in a negotiating or contract administration situation.

I’ve become convinced from bitter experience that it would be far better for orchestra musicians’ associations to set up and maintain some kind of centralized record of significant events and documents than to depend on the Local, or the management, or the Local’s legal counsel, to reconstruct a record that might be many years in the past but still needed. Such a record could be relatively simple; even just knowing when something happened and who was involved would be a great help in tracking down the relevant documentation from the Local’s files.

Think of it as a ship’s log. And imagine what fun the historians of the 22nd century (assuming there will be one, of course) will have with such a record.


More posts by :

View all posts by

Comments feed top ↑

No comments yet